An internet portal for the development of clinical practice guidelines

Wolfgang J. Höhne, T. Karge, B. Siegmund, J. Preiss, J. C. Hoffmann, M. Zeitz, U. R. Fölsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The complexity and quality requirements for the development of clinical practice guidelines steadily increase. Internet technologies support this process by optimizing the development process. Objective: The aim of this internet based solution was to facilitate the development of clinical practice guidelines. Methods: An internet portal was developed allowing for a shared workplace to support clinical practice guideline authoring. It is based on a Content Management System and combines different tools for document handling and editing, communication as well as process and team steering. Results: Until now, the internet portal has been successfully implicated in the development of six evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines. Additional German and European clinical practice guidelines are currently generated with support of the internet portal. The available tools allow for a flexible design of the scheduled workflow, depending on the requirements of the respective group. An additional strength of the platform is the advantage to transfer all data from a previous version of a guideline into the next 'life-cycle'. Conclusion: The application of the portal results in a considerable reduction of costs and development time of the resulting clinical practice guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-441
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Authoring
  • Clinical practice guideline
  • Internet portal
  • Quality management
  • Voting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An internet portal for the development of clinical practice guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this