Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a prospective, controlled, non-randomized patient study to determine the systemic response to extraperitoneal laparoscopic (eLRP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 403 patients who had eLRP (163) or open RRP (240) were recruited; patients in both groups had similar preoperative staging. In addition to peri-operative variables (operative duration, complications, blood loss, transfusion rate, hospitalization, catheterization), oncological data (Gleason score, pathological stage, positive margins) were also compared. The extent of the systemic response to surgery-induced tissue trauma was measured in all patients, by assessing the levels of acute-phase markers C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 before, during and after RP. RESULTS: The duration of surgery, transfusion rate, hospital stay and duration of catheterization were comparable with those in previous studies. There was an increase in IL-6, CRP and SAA but no change in IL-10, and no differences between eLRP and RRP over the entire period assessed. CONCLUSION: The invasiveness of eLRP could not be substantiated objectively based on the variables measured in this study. The surgical trauma and associated invasiveness of both methods were equivalent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1461-1466
Number of pages6
JournalBJU International
Volume99
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Keywords

  • Invasiveness
  • Laparoscopy
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Retropubic
  • Stress response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this