TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the parent-rated assessment scale of positive and negative parenting behavior (FPNE) in a German sample of school-aged children
AU - the ADOPT, the ESCAlife consortia
AU - Holas, Vanessa
AU - Thöne, Ann Kathrin
AU - Dose, Christina
AU - Gebauer, Stephanie
AU - Hautmann, Christopher
AU - Görtz-Dorten, Anja
AU - Kohl, Lea Teresa
AU - Plück, Julia
AU - Treier, Anne Katrin
AU - Banaschewski, Tobias
AU - Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike
AU - Rößner, Veit
AU - Hanisch, Charlotte
AU - Kölch, Michael
AU - Holtmann, Martin
AU - Becker, Katja
AU - Renner, Tobias
AU - Geissler, Julia
AU - Wenning, Jasmin
AU - Huss, Michael
AU - Poustka, Luise
AU - Döpfner, Manfred
AU - Ziegler, Mirjam
AU - Wirth, Elena
AU - Winkler, Matthias
AU - Wermter, Anne Kathrin
AU - Weber, Linda
AU - Vetter, Paula
AU - Vandersleben, Henrik Uebel von
AU - Thöne, Ann Katrin
AU - Steiner, Marie Therese
AU - Steinacker, Ida
AU - Stehr, Thomas
AU - Schulze-Husmann, Karen
AU - Schrott, Bastian
AU - Schöllhorn, Anja
AU - Schneider, Priska
AU - Romanos, Marcel
AU - Poustka, Louisa
AU - Pascher, Anja
AU - Mross, Melinda
AU - Mingebach, Tanja
AU - Millenet, Sabrina
AU - Martin, Franziska
AU - Mann, Christopher
AU - Legenbauer, Tanja
AU - Krugmann, Katrin
AU - Kirschbaum-Lesch, Inken
AU - Kieninger, Franziska
AU - Ketter, Johanna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a parent-rated parenting assessment scale including positive and negative dimensions of parenting. Factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, latent mean differences and construct validity of the Assessment Scale of Positive and Negative Parenting Behavior (FPNE) were tested in a pooled sample of five studies of 1,879 school-aged children (6.00 to 12.11 years). Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a first randomized split-half sample, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were conducted in the second half of the sample. Measurement invariance tests were conducted to assess factor structure equivalence across gender and age. Results: The EFA results supported a two-factor structure and the CFA results revealed a model with two correlated factors (Positive Parenting, Negative Parenting), which included 23 items and showed acceptable model fit and good psychometric properties. ESEM did not yield a model with significantly better model fit. Internal consistencies were acceptable. Adequate concurrent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the FPNE and similar constructs. The factor structure was invariant (configural, metric, scalar) across different age groups and gender. Tests of latent mean differences revealed that older children scored significantly higher on negative parenting than younger children, while boys showed lower levels of positive parenting and higher levels of negative parenting compared to girls. All effect sizes were small. Conclusions: The results suggest that the FPNE is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of parenting.
AB - Background: The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a parent-rated parenting assessment scale including positive and negative dimensions of parenting. Factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, latent mean differences and construct validity of the Assessment Scale of Positive and Negative Parenting Behavior (FPNE) were tested in a pooled sample of five studies of 1,879 school-aged children (6.00 to 12.11 years). Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a first randomized split-half sample, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were conducted in the second half of the sample. Measurement invariance tests were conducted to assess factor structure equivalence across gender and age. Results: The EFA results supported a two-factor structure and the CFA results revealed a model with two correlated factors (Positive Parenting, Negative Parenting), which included 23 items and showed acceptable model fit and good psychometric properties. ESEM did not yield a model with significantly better model fit. Internal consistencies were acceptable. Adequate concurrent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the FPNE and similar constructs. The factor structure was invariant (configural, metric, scalar) across different age groups and gender. Tests of latent mean differences revealed that older children scored significantly higher on negative parenting than younger children, while boys showed lower levels of positive parenting and higher levels of negative parenting compared to girls. All effect sizes were small. Conclusions: The results suggest that the FPNE is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of parenting.
KW - Assessment
KW - Children and adolescents
KW - Externalizing disorders
KW - Parenting
KW - Psychometric properties
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85212173528
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85212173528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9
DO - 10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85212173528
SN - 1753-2000
VL - 18
JO - Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
JF - Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
IS - 1
M1 - 157
ER -