TY - JOUR
T1 - Bright Light Therapy as Add-On to Inpatient Treatment in Youth with Moderate to Severe Depression
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Legenbauer, Tanja
AU - Kirschbaum-Lesch, Inken
AU - Jörke, Carina
AU - Kölch, Michael
AU - Reis, Olaf
AU - Berger, Christoph
AU - Dück, Alexander
AU - Schulte-Markwort, Michael
AU - Becker-Hebly, Inga
AU - Bienioschek, Stefanie
AU - Schroth, Jennifer
AU - Ruckes, Christian
AU - Deuster, Oliver
AU - Holtmann, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Importance: Major depressive disorder is one of the most common mental disorders among adolescents, entailing severe, long-term psychosocial impairment and a high risk of chronicity. In view of the large number of patients requiring treatment, along with insufficient treatment responses with small effect sizes, innovative adjunctive treatment strategies are urgently needed. Objective: To investigate whether the effect of adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual for major depressive disorder can be enhanced by simultaneous use of morning bright light therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized parallel-group trial with enrollment between March 2018 and November 2020 and follow-up completed in May 2021. The study took place among inpatients at 4 university hospitals for child and adolescent psychiatry across Germany. Of 248 eligible youth aged 12 to 18 years fulfilling ICD-10 criteria for major depressive disorder, 227 were randomized to bright light therapy (n = 116) or placebo red light (n = 111); 151 participants completed the study. Interventions: Up to 20 sessions of either morning bright light therapy with an intensity of 10000 lux or placebo red light (100 lux) in addition to multimodal inpatient treatment as usual over 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score from baseline to posttreatment in the intention-to-treat sample. Results: Among the 224 patients included in the intention-to-treat analyses (192 girls and 32 boys; mean [SD] age, 15.5 [1.4] years), the mean (SD) BDI-II score at baseline was 37.3 (8.7). BDI-II scores were significantly reduced after 4 weeks (postassessment) by a mean of -7.5 (95% CI, -9.0 to -6.0; Hedges g = 0.71). Bright light therapy had no impact on this change (no significant group × time effect). Loss to follow-up was 31% (n = 69) at 16 weeks and 49% (n = 110) at 28 weeks. There were 10 serious adverse events throughout the whole trial, which were not considered related to study treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study did not indicate superiority of bright light therapy over placebo red light therapy in a large sample of adolescent inpatients with moderate or severe major depressive disorder. Both groups benefited equally from treatment as usual, showing relevant symptom reduction. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00013188.
AB - Importance: Major depressive disorder is one of the most common mental disorders among adolescents, entailing severe, long-term psychosocial impairment and a high risk of chronicity. In view of the large number of patients requiring treatment, along with insufficient treatment responses with small effect sizes, innovative adjunctive treatment strategies are urgently needed. Objective: To investigate whether the effect of adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual for major depressive disorder can be enhanced by simultaneous use of morning bright light therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized parallel-group trial with enrollment between March 2018 and November 2020 and follow-up completed in May 2021. The study took place among inpatients at 4 university hospitals for child and adolescent psychiatry across Germany. Of 248 eligible youth aged 12 to 18 years fulfilling ICD-10 criteria for major depressive disorder, 227 were randomized to bright light therapy (n = 116) or placebo red light (n = 111); 151 participants completed the study. Interventions: Up to 20 sessions of either morning bright light therapy with an intensity of 10000 lux or placebo red light (100 lux) in addition to multimodal inpatient treatment as usual over 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score from baseline to posttreatment in the intention-to-treat sample. Results: Among the 224 patients included in the intention-to-treat analyses (192 girls and 32 boys; mean [SD] age, 15.5 [1.4] years), the mean (SD) BDI-II score at baseline was 37.3 (8.7). BDI-II scores were significantly reduced after 4 weeks (postassessment) by a mean of -7.5 (95% CI, -9.0 to -6.0; Hedges g = 0.71). Bright light therapy had no impact on this change (no significant group × time effect). Loss to follow-up was 31% (n = 69) at 16 weeks and 49% (n = 110) at 28 weeks. There were 10 serious adverse events throughout the whole trial, which were not considered related to study treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study did not indicate superiority of bright light therapy over placebo red light therapy in a large sample of adolescent inpatients with moderate or severe major depressive disorder. Both groups benefited equally from treatment as usual, showing relevant symptom reduction. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00013188.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188003801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188003801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0103
DO - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0103
M3 - Article
C2 - 38477894
AN - SCOPUS:85188003801
SN - 2168-622X
JO - JAMA Psychiatry
JF - JAMA Psychiatry
ER -